Readers of this blog know I have an ongoing fascination with the CMBX index. What is it exactly? Why was it so high? And why has it come down again? What exactly does it tell us about the future of commercial real estate?
Here are links to my earlier posts:
Well, here's an updated picture of what it looks like today:
Apparently the CMBX index - the oracle that it is - no longer believes that there is a high risk for defaults in commercial real estate in the coming year. Remember that when the CMBX goes down, it indicates a lower 'spread' and therefore the prediction of a lower risk for default. This trend is happening just as real economic data is emerging that contradicts this sentiment: take a look at this post on Mish's Global Economic Trends. Here are some highlights:
Vacancies in commercial real estate is increasing rapidly -it is expected to peak at 18% in 2008. Architectural billings in the US are down almost 78% over one year. look at the right-hand side of this chart :
Shopping centre vacancies are increasing rapidly - already at 28%:
And yet the CMBX index seems to suggest that the likelihood of defaults in commercial real estates has now gone down? Is this realistic? Or is this index too heavily influenced by short selling and speculation to be meaningful?
I found an interesting opinion on this on another blog. Myles Lichtenberg writes on
Maryland Commercial Title's corporate blog about this. He quotes a report by Moody's:
“If sellers were forced to sell, as can occur when banks foreclose on loans and subsequently sell off the collateral property, a more dramatic drop in prices would likely result.
However, when sellers are not compelled to sell, prices do not or can not adjust. In fact, prices can hover at some level in nominal terms for an extended period before responding to a changed market environment.”
The insight here is that even though the performance of commercial real estate might decline on a cash-flow basis, this will not mean that prices will fall. Large financial and institutional investors will choose to weather the storm. the number of transactions is likely to drop off, but prices are likely to remain much more stable than in residential sector. Asset price stability and the presence of well capitalized buyers will protect even the over-leveraged in the commercial real estate market. If the market value of the assets remain and as long as there are a few buyers, an cash strapped owner can get out by selling. The value of the asset as collateral will also help in any 'work-out' with lenders.
So have investors realized this difference? And has this insight been reflected in the CMBX index? Or am I reaching here? -just to maintain my faith in the value of a derivative index?
Factoid: Markit, the creators of the CMBX index is a spin-off from the TD bank - a Canadian connection!




